IP involves multiple players, constantly exchanging an incredible amount of data


In essence, as FICPI members know very well, Intellectual Property (IP) involves multiple players, constantly exchanging an incredible amount of data:

  • Corporates and research centres, continuously generating and managing intellectual property, mostly around patents, trademarks and designs.
  • Patent and trademark attorneys, helping and guiding their clients in protecting their IP and prosecuting and defending their IP rights, worldwide.
  • Patent and trademark offices, examining, granting and maintaining IP rights, whether at national, regional or international level.

Supporting these organisations, software and service providers help streamline exchanges, by developing tools and services designed to better manage IP assets, and their associated data and workflows, tailored to the legal specificities of each worldwide jurisdiction.


Due to the territorial nature of IP rights, market players, and FICPI members especially, have developed worldwide networks, interacting with many other players, both locally and internationally.

Each player generates, manages, stores and transmits IP-related data to other players around the world.

Whilst the data required by each player is roughly the same, how such data is transmitted or exploited will be different depending on whether the interested party is an IP owner, an IP firm or a Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). Even worse, in practice, every IP owner, IP firm or PTO operates differently. Software and service providers generally adapt their solutions to specifics imposed by their customers.

As of today, each player fills-in and verifies, in its own IP management system, data sets which have already been filled-in and verified in another IP management system, by another player.

Such an approach engenders loss of efficiency and increases the risk of human error, while the consequence of any data error may lead to loss of Rights.


Based on this observation, an initial group of French-based IP players met in July 2013, under the leadership of Marc Levieils, partner at Cabinet Regimbeau.

The idea, led by this group, mixing private practice IP attorneys, in-house counsels, software and service providers, was first to review the situation in terms of data exchange practices (type of data, frequency, etc.) and existing standards. As a second step, the group started working on possible exchange frameworks, with the objective to come up with a single, practical solution, acceptable by all parties involved.

Once the founding elements had been defined, the group jointly decided to formalise the concept by preparing and drafting an official standard. Consequently, starting in 2015, a working group on IP data exchange standards was created under the aegis of the Innovation Management committee within AFNOR, the French National Organization for Standardization (AFNOR/CN INNOV GT 5).

As a result, French standard AFNOR NF X50-276 was drafted and officially published on 3rd February 2018, a standard now promoted by EDIPI, the Association for IP Data Exchange Standards (please visit https://edipi.org for more details).


IP players frequently communicate among themselves, mostly electronically, and are all confronted with the same issues:

  • International exchanges
  • Secured exchanges
  • Complex processes
  • Frequent deadlines
  • Variety of IT systems
  • Individualised specifications

The combination of all these challenges results in extremely high transaction costs and current communication means do not resolve most of the issues IP professionals face, as communications must be:

  • Reliable
  • Efficent
  • Integrated
  • Flexible

Modern technology allows communications to be exchanged in a much more agile, optimised and secure manner, using data exchange standards, avoiding duplicate data entries and risk of errors.

Patent and Trademark Offices have been exploiting data exchange standards for many years, standards which are managed by the World IP Organisation (WIPO). Standard ST.36, for example, describes an XML-based standard for communicating patent-related information. These standards have been developed and are mostly used by Patent and Trademark Offices.

In the US, a standard known under the acronym “UTBMS” since the mid-90s, describes the tasks delivered by outside legal counsels, thereby easing the invoicing process and facilitating financial analytics around legal services. As of today, the standard continues to evolve under the LEDES (Legal Electronic Data Exchange Standard) umbrella and includes a dedicated IP section.

EDIPI promotes even broader data exchange standards across the IP community; a standard developed by IP professionals for the benefit of all IP players, covering all IP rights and the full IP lifecycle.

Further information

FICPI members are invited to contact and/or join the group at https://edipi.org.

Next steps 

Watch the recording of the FICPI webinar “First use cases of IP data exchange for improved communications between IP stakeholders“, held on 10 December 2020. 

View the PowerPoint presentation from the webinar.

How FICPI makes IP attorneys more effective 

FICPI is a worldwide organisation dedicated to strengthening the practice of independent IP attorneys and making them more effective. Strong shared interest within FICPI is a key driver in promoting common solutions and advocacy for private practice.

Previous Post
Analysis of practical determination on whether parody constitutes infringement in the Taiwan Intellectual Property Court